Instrumental possibilities of skin parameters assessment — literature review


measurement of skin parameters
instrumental skin examination pomiar parametrów skóry
badanie instrumentalne skóry

How to Cite

Stachowiak S, Buszmak A, Matthews-Brzozowska T, Kubisz L. Instrumental possibilities of skin parameters assessment — literature review. JoFA [Internet]. 2020Dec.31 [cited 2021Oct.28];3(2):122-3. Available from:


The authors reviewed the literature on the most commonly used devices for measuring skin parameters. The instruments were selected to measure: skin elasticity Cutometer® (Courage-Khazaka, Koln, Germany), Reviscometer® RVM600; hydration while using skin properties such as resistance, capacity, conductivity and impedance, the Corneometer CM 820 and CM 825 (Courage & Khazaka, Koln, Germany), Nova DPM 9003 (Nova Technology Corporation, Gloucester, MA, USA), DermaLab® USB Moisture Module (Cortex Technology, Hadsund, Denmark) and Scalar Moisture Checker MY-808S (Scalar Corporation, Japan), to test percutaneous water loss (TEWL) with Tewameter® TM 300 (Courage-Khazaka, Koln, Germany); high-frequency ultrasound scanners Dub®SkinScanner 75 (TPM Company, Lueneburg, Germany), DermaScan® C USB (Cortex Technology, Hadsund, Denmark); for pH measurement Skin-pH-Meter PH 905 (Courage-Khazaka, Koln, Germany), Skin-pH-Meter PH 900 (Courage-Khazaka, Koln, Germany, pH-Meter 1140 (Mettler Toledo, Urdorf, Switzerland); skin sebum is tested by Sebumeter® SM 815 (Courage-Khazaka, Koln, Germany); the Mexameter® MX 18 (Courage-Khazaka, Koln, Germany), CM-2600d Spectrophotometer (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan) and Minolta Chromameter CR-200 (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan. The analysis of measuring devices available on the market introduces the mechanism of their operation and application.


Trojahn C, Dobos G, Lichterfeld A, Blume-Peytavi U, Kottner J. Characterizing Facial Skin Ageing in Humans: Disentangling Extrinsic from Intrinsic Biological Phenomena. Hindawi Publishing CorporationBioMed Research International 2015;1:1–9.

Blank IH. Factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 1952;18:433–40.

Fluhr JW, Gloor M, Lazzerini S, Kleesz P, Grieshaber R, BerardescaE. Comparative study of five instruments measuring stratum corneum hydration (Corneometer CM 820 and CM 825, Skicon 200, Nova DPM 9003, Dermalab). Part I In vitro. Skin Res Technol 1999;5:161–170.

Clarys P, Alewaeters K, Lambrecht R, Barel AO. Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter(R), the DermaSpectrometer(R) and the Mexameter(R). Skin Research and Technology 2000;6:230–238.

Ehlers C, Ivens I, Mřller M, Senderovitz T, Serup J. Comparison of two pH meters used for skin surface pH measurement: the pH meter ‘pH900’ from Courage &Khazaka versus the pH meter ‘1140’ from Mettler Toledo. Skin Research and Technology 2001;7:84–89.

Youn S, Na J, Choi S, Hun Huh Ch, Park K. Regional and seasonal variations in facial sebumsecretions: a proposal for the definition of combination skin type. Skin Research and Technology 2005;11:189–195.

Lambers H, Piessens S, Bloem A, Pronk H, Finkel P. Natural skin surface pH is on average below 5, which is beneficial for its resident flora. Int J Cosmet Sci 2006;28:359.

Pedersen L, Jemec G. Mechanical Properties and Barrier Function of Healthy Human Skin. Acta Derm Venereol 2006;86:308–311.

Krueger N, Luebberding S, Oltmer M, Streker M, Kerscher M. Age-related changes in skin mechanical properties: a quantitative evaluation of 120 female subjects. Skin Research and Technology 2011;17: 141–148.

Choi J, Kwon S, Hun Huh Ch, Park K, WoongYoun S. The influences of skin visco-elasticity, hydration level and aging on the formation of wrinkles: a comprehensive and objective approach. Skin Research and Technology 2012;0:1–7.

Mohamad M, Msabbri A, MatJafri M. Non Invasive Measurement of Skin Hydration and Transepidermal Water Loss in Normal Skin. IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science &Engineering Research CHUSER 2012;3–4.

Neto P, Ferreira M, Bahia F, Costa P. Improvement of the methods for skin mechanical properties evaluation through correlation between different techniques and factor analysis. Skin Research and Technology 2013;19:405–416.

Mlosek R, Malinowska S. Ultrasonograficzny obraz skóry, aparatura

i podstawy obrazowania.J Ultrason 2013;13:212–221.

Fluhr J, Darlenski R. Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL). Non Invasive Diagnostic Techniques in Clinical Dermatology 2014:353–356.

Luebberding S, Krueger N, Kerscher M. Mechanical properties of human skin in vivo: a comparative evaluation in 300 men and women. Skin Research and Technology 2014;20:127–135.

Anthonissen M, Daly D, Peeters R, Van Brussel M, Fieuws S, Moortgat P, Flour M, Van den Kerckhove E. Reliability of Repeated Measurements on Post-Burn Scars with Corneometer CM 825®. Skin Research and Technology 2015;21:302–312.

Hashmi F, Wright C, Nester Ch, Lam S. The reliability of non-invasive biophysicaloutcome measures for evaluating normal and hyperkeratotic foot skin. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2015;8:28.

Miyuki Tanaka M, Yamamoto Y, Misawa E, Nabeshima K, Saito M, Yamauchi K, Abe F, Furukawa F. Effects of Aloe Sterol Supplementation on Skin Elasticity, Hydration, and Collagen Score: A 12-Week Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Skin PharmacolPhysiol 2016;29:309–317.

Barcaui E, Carvalho A, Lopes F, Piñeiro-Maceira J, Barcaui C. High frequency ultrasound with color Doppler in dermatology. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2016;91:262-273.

Crowther JM. Method for quantification of oils and sebum levels on skin using the Sebumeter®. International journal of cosmetic science Lubnt J Cosmet Sci. 2016;38:210-6.

Gardien KL, Baas DC, de Vet HC, Middelkoop E. Transepidermal water loss measured with the Tewameter TM300 in burn scars. Burns 2016; 42:1455–1462.

Firooz A, Rajabi-Estarabadi A, Zartab H, Pazhohi N, Fanian F, Janani L. The influence of gender and age on the thickness and echo‐density of skin. Skin Research and Technology 2016;23.

Prakash C, Bhargava P, Tiwari S, Majumdar B, Bhargava RK. Skin Surface pH in Acne Vulgaris: Insights from an Observational Study and Review of the Literature.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol 2017;10:33–39.

Strona internetowa Courage + Khazaka electric GmbH. Corneometer® CM 825, Dostęp 23.06.2020.